It would be very useful to be able to select multiple nodes in the HyperSearch Results dockable and then use "Remove node" to remove all of them. This is much quicker than selecting "remove node" for each of those nodes.
Submitted | shlomy - 2008-05-26 - 09:04:37z | Assigned | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Priority | 5 | Category | core |
Status | Open | Group | None |
Resolution | None | Visibility | No |
2008-05-26 - 15:26:56z daleanson |
Logged In: YES user_id=187628 Originator: NO +1 |
---|---|
2008-05-26 - 15:31:51z kpouer |
Logged In: YES user_id=285591 Originator: NO I also agree with that feature request, a suggested behavior would be : simple click for selecting, double click to open the buffer and go to the selected result |
2008-09-28 - 18:27:24z shlomy |
I didn't pay attention to this, but I actually like the single-click jump from hypersearch results, it is often very useful for me. I would therefore say, let's put some toggle button in the hypersearch result dockable, determining the jump mode - single click or double click. When in double-click mode, the user can multi-select from the list (sort of "jump mode" vs "delete nodes" mode). What do you say? |
2009-04-18 - 17:46:05z shlomy |
Any suggestions for how to allow multiple selection in the hypersearch results tree? |
2009-04-18 - 20:47:13z rschwenn |
For me, CTRL+left-click would be the expected way for multiple selection in general.
At least in Windows it's a common way for that. The current jumping behavior wouldn't
have to be changed then. |
2009-09-09 - 05:52:59z shlomy |
Regarding Ctrl+Left-click: This is the expected way to mark multiple items in Windows,
excluding the first one. The expected way is to left-click the first item, then Ctrl+Left-click
for the rest. Have added support for hypersearch-results to buffer and vice versa, which makes it easy to filter out the results from the buffer listing them, do you think this feature request is still useful? |